Laboratory Equipment Monitoring
People love surveys, and we’re no exception. After all, data from a pool of respondents on an interesting topic lets you pattern match to see if your profile matches your cohort. So, being the curious types that we are, Elemental Machines conducted a survey of lab managers and other science professionals to:
Here’s what we found.
First, most people can relate to the issue of lab losses -- sadly. From our data, 71% of respondents have experienced catastrophic equipment failure that resulted in loss of critical samples or materials. To the survey takers and others who’ve shared that experience, we’re terribly sorry. Truly.
71% of survey respondents have experienced catastrophic equipment failures that have resulted in loss of critical samples or materials
Counterintuitively, only 25% monitor all of their equipment, while 64% monitor some pieces of equipment. We found that fascinating since we’re always trying to figure out how people choose which equipment to monitor (value of contents, frequency of use, for example). As for the equipment monitored most frequently, there aren’t really any surprises -- refrigerators and freezers held the lead at 90%, with incubators in second place at 51%, followed by cold rooms (30%), and ovens (10%).
On the topic of what people do with the data, we were fascinated, given the above!
All good uses for the data, for sure.
The Scary Part?
First, thank you to respondents for their candor. Based on the answers provided, we are confident that responses are accurate. Scarily accurate, in fact. To the question, “Where do you store the data?” answers were distributed across a broad spectrum. They ranged from hard drive to thumb drive to cloud to paper notebook, and everything in between. Some store data electronically (server, USB drive) and others store it in a notebook or binder, while others have a hybrid approach of printing and storing in the cloud.
This is the state of the state in most every laboratory, and the issue isn’t limited to monitoring data. These answers likely apply to all types of data, and reveal the reality about data-management strategies in laboratory environments: many teams do not have a consistent and integrated approach to managing, storing and using data. They also have gaps in the data they access and use, all of which hamper their work.
Moving to a Data-First Approach
Moving towards an integrated, data-first approach has the potential to transform science-based industries, just as data-driven strategies have been used to optimize manufacturing of numerous types of products, from automotive to pharma. We see ample evidence that the various science-based industries -- from pharma to synthetic biology to agro science -- are moving in this direction, but the challenge is where to start since the problem is vast and the range of possible solutions can be overwhelming.
While we don’t purport to have all of the answers, we do have some recommendations. They are outlined more comprehensively in our white paper, The Smart Lab, the IoT and the Data-Driven Lab Manager, which we encourage you to download. It’s a framework for thinking about the issue. We also encourage you to think about your long-term goals and make short-term decisions that align with those goals. For example, if you’re considering a monitoring solution -- either for the first time, or to replace a legacy system -- make sure one of your key evaluation criteria is seamless data exchange between your monitoring system and other systems of record. Any system that puts the burden on staff to manually move data from one system to another isn’t helping move forward.
Monitoring | A Springboard into the Smart Lab
While the data show that monitoring is widespread, it’s time to begin thinking of monitoring as a pathway to the Smart Lab, rather than a goal unto itself. With that view, teams begin to think about the data provided by the monitoring system and how they can use that data to accelerate their work. And that is our mission -- to provide data-driven insights from the physical world to accelerate R&D and optimize manufacturing.
How hard is it to install this equipment? That’s a question we get a lot. A wireless Internet of Things sensor that continuously monitors cold storage temperatures and transmits this information to the Cloud sounds like it might be a complicated thing to install. It’s not. Our Element-T installs in less than a minute. It is battery powered and magnetically mounted to freezers, fridges and other equipment. There are no holes to drill to mount it and no power cords or other connection cables.
To watch a short video of an Element-T installation click here.
The Element-T (ET) is a wireless, portable, Internet of Things temperature sensor typically used to monitor the temperature of critical equipment. The Element-T uses a thermocouple to measure temperatures and transmits those readings to a WiFi and cellular-enabled tablet. The tablet, or gateway, securely uploads these temperature readings to the Elemental Cloud.
Dimensions: 2.25" x 1.6" x 1"
2-AAA Lithium batteries, user replaceable
Battery lifetime: 1 year (9 mos typical)
The Element-T is typically mounted magnetically to the outside of the asset it is monitoring. It contains a very strong magnet that holds it firmly in place. If it is attaching to a non-ferrous surface, you can use double-sided Velcro to hold it in place. There are no mounting holes or screw required.
Temperature (Element-T electronics)
Range: 5C to 45C
Accuracy ± 0.5C
The temperature in each device (i.e. in the
Element-T electronics) are factory calibrated to
a *NIST traceable standard.
Temperature (Omega thermocouple probe)
Range: -200C to +200C
Accuracy ± 1.0C
The electronics in the Element-T can actually read
Up to +400C. However, the accuracy is weaker.
To keep the specification simple at and accuracy
of ± 1.0C, EM will claim only up to 200C
· NIST certified sensors are available for an extra fee. These can be calibrated in-situ in the field for regulated environments